Massachusetts Criminal Defense Practice Areas

Serpa Law Office represents people in Massachusetts clerk-magistrate hearings, District Court and Boston Municipal Court cases, and Superior Court prosecutions. The practice includes OUI and motor vehicle offenses, domestic violence and restraining orders, drug and firearms charges, theft and financial crimes, sex offenses, and the consequences a criminal case may create for a record, professional license, education, or immigration status. This page organizes the firm’s criminal-defense resources by court stage, legal issue, charge, consequence, FAQ, and courthouse.

Attorney Joe Serpa has practiced Massachusetts criminal defense since 1995. In an eligible case, representation may begin at a private clerk-magistrate hearing before a complaint or arraignment. If the clerk-magistrate denies the application, that application produces no complaint, arraignment, or CORI entry. An arraigned case may later end in dismissal, but the court record remains unless it is sealed. The firm’s case results, dismissal results, and client reviews provide examples of the representation.

Students, licensed professionals, security-clearance holders, and noncitizens may face consequences outside the criminal sentence. Counsel should identify the exact disclosure rule, immigration issue, licensing standard, school process, and CORI effect before recommending a disposition. The sections below link directly to the detailed page for each subject. To discuss a Massachusetts criminal case, call Serpa Law Office at 617.936.0201 or request a free consultation.

The Criminal Process

The pages in this section explain how a case begins, when arraignment creates a CORI entry, how a Superior Court indictment differs from a District Court complaint, and what procedures may end the case before trial.

Criminal Court Practice: Trial, Evidence, and Sentencing

The pages in this section cover the courtroom itself, from the motions filed on the eve of trial through the sentence and the motions available after it.

Constitutional Rights in Massachusetts Criminal Cases

The pages in this section explain how federal and Massachusetts constitutional protections affect police stops, searches, questioning, compelled testimony, evidence, and trial.

  • Massachusetts Spousal Privilege and Marital Communications. The witness-spouse choice not to testify under G.L. c. 233, § 20, Second, the separate disqualification of private marital conversations under § 20, First, the statutory exceptions, and why written communications fall outside the rule.
  • Criminal Records and Case Outcomes

    The stage and disposition determine whether a case creates a CORI entry and how later sealing rules apply.

    If a clerk-magistrate denies an application before a complaint issues, that application creates no arraignment-based CORI entry. A CWOF requires an admission to sufficient facts and remains in the court record after dismissal unless it is sealed. Federal immigration law and professional regulators may apply their own rules to that disposition. The pages in this section explain CORI access, dismissals, CWOFs, pretrial probation, diversion, sealing, expungement, and profession-specific reporting duties.

    Domestic Violence and Restraining Orders

    Massachusetts domestic violence allegations can produce several proceedings within a short period. Police may make an arrest, the court may impose criminal release conditions, and a separate 209A case may require the defendant to leave a home or surrender firearms. District Attorney’s Offices commonly continue a prosecution even when the complaining witness later asks that it end. The pages below address the criminal charges, civil orders, evidence, and collateral consequences separately.

    OUI, DUI, and Motor Vehicle Offenses

    Criminal Charges Defense

    Immigration Consequences

    FAQs and Criminal Law Resources

    Courts Where Serpa Law Office Practices

    Attorney Joe Serpa represents defendants in the Boston Municipal Court and in District and Superior Courts throughout eastern and central Massachusetts. The Massachusetts District Courts directory identifies the individual courts and the communities each court serves.

    Attorney Serpa has obtained not-guilty jury verdicts in the Suffolk, Norfolk, Middlesex, Plymouth, Bristol, and Essex County Superior Courts, including acquittals in first-degree murder, aggravated rape, armed assault with intent to murder, and mayhem cases. The firm’s representative trial results provide additional anonymous examples.

    Prospective clients may call Serpa Law Office at 617.936.0201 or request a free consultation. The firm has offices in Boston and Quincy.

    Client Reviews

    He's one of the best people I've met. I'm really appreciative of all the help I received. If you have a serious case, he'll work hard to make sure you have the best outcome. I highly recommend him. You will not be disappointed.

    A.J

    Mr. Serpa was very helpful with my family member ‘s case. He was able to get it dismissed quickly and easily. He is very professional and very good at what he does. I’m so glad he hired him. You will be glad too if you hire him.

    Z.M.

    Serpa law office was my attorney of choice for 2 seperate cases I had last year. With both situations, Joseph not only treated me great, delivered the results I was hoping for, and was extremely professional and genuine. I would definitely recommend this law office to anyone in need of legal help.

    P.C.

    Greater Boston Criminal Law Alerts

    The Lindsay Clancy Jury Dispute: When Massachusetts Law Permits Removal of a Deliberating Juror

    Massachusetts law does not permit a trial judge to remove a deliberating juror merely because the other eleven jurors believe that person is wrong. Once deliberations begin, the judge may discharge a juror only after a hearing establishes an emergency, another compelling reason, or a demonstrated inability to perform the duties of a juror. Disagreement…

    Filming Jurors in the Lindsay Clancy Trial and Massachusetts Witness Intimidation Law

    An arrest after the alleged filming of jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial raises separate questions under the witness-intimidation, evidence-tampering, contempt, and wiretap laws. This analysis applies each rule without presuming the allegations are true.

    How I Try a Massachusetts OUI Case After a Breathalyzer Refusal

    A driver who refuses the breathalyzer after an arrest faces an OUI prosecution without a breath result from the certified device. When the case contains no separate hospital or independent blood-alcohol result, the Commonwealth must prove impairment through the driving, the officer’s observations, statements, video, roadside exercises, and conduct at booking. The refusal itself cannot…

    Contact Us

    1. 1 Individual, Hands-On Approach
    2. 2 Winning Trial Record
    3. 3 Criminal Defense Since 1995
    Fill out the contact form or call us at 617.936.0201 to schedule your free consultation.

    Leave Us a Message

    We Accept the Following Payment Solutions